• You are currently browsing the archives for the Carbonomics category.

Authors

Podcast

Categories

Carbonomics

Older Archives

Why is Ethanol not green [Carbonomics, Ch. 10]

December 23rd, 2006 by Steven Stoft, Berkeley

Ethanol, which seems to reduce greenhouse gases 12 percent compared with gasoline, actually increases greenhouse gases by 14 percent when the effects of the world oil market are accounted for.
Continue reading »

Global Warming with Synfuels [Carbonomics, Ch. 11]

December 22nd, 2006 by Steven Stoft, Berkeley

Unconventional fuels, that is gas or oil from coal, shale and tar sands are a bit helpful for security of supply but about the worst thing going for the environement.

Continue reading »

Is Carbon Sequestration a Viable Solution? [Carbonomics, Ch.12]

December 21st, 2006 by Steven Stoft, Berkeley

Coal-fired power generation is the largest, fastest growing contributor to global warming.

Continue reading »

OPEC’s Greatest Fear [Carbonomics, Ch. 13]

December 20th, 2006 by Steven Stoft, Berkeley

If you want to know what strategy would work against OPEC, listen to OPEC.
Continue reading »

Carbon tax is better than cap and trade [Carbonomics, Ch. 14]

December 19th, 2006 by Steven Stoft, Berkeley

Over 2,600 economists, including nine recipients of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, signed a statement that concludes, “The most efficient approach to slowing climate change is through … market mechanisms, such as carbon taxes or the auction of emissions permits.”
Continue reading »

Implementing the carbon untax [Carbonomics, Ch. 16]

December 18th, 2006 by Steven Stoft, Berkeley

The carbon untax is the silver bullet of energy policies, and the central policy recommendation of James E. Hansen, NASA’s top climate scientist and Al Gore’s science adviser. Here’s how I recommend implementing it. Continue reading »

What’s the psychology of a carbon tax? [Ch. 17]

December 17th, 2006 by Steven Stoft, Berkeley

The objection that everyone will ignore a carbon tax because they are addicted to fossil fuel—that the tax is too small to matter—is based on a view of people that lumps them into a few types, sometimes even just two types.
Continue reading »

Why untaxing is fair [Carbonomics, Ch. 18]

December 16th, 2006 by Steven Stoft, Berkeley

For twenty-five years I bought the standard economic analysis that using the carbon-tax revenues in place of other tax revenues is a great idea. But here’s why it’s better to just refund a carbon tax on an equal-per-person basis.
Continue reading »

Paying More to Save Money [Carbonomics, Ch. 19]

December 15th, 2006 by Steven Stoft, Berkeley

Can taxing oil really make us richer? It can, and the untax makes it easier to see how this works.

Continue reading »

A Race To Fuel Economy [Carbonomics, Ch. 20]

December 14th, 2006 by Steven Stoft, Berkeley

Imagine a foot race in which there is no prize for the winner, but instead, the race committee, after holding extensive hearings, sets a minimum time for the slowest runner. At the hearing, the runners are expert witnesses. They are mad about the cost of the race and have influential friends. For 22 years, the runners have said the minimum time was fast enough, and the race committee has accepted it. That’s a poor design for a race. But it’s a pretty accurate description of the US standard setting process of car gasoline consumption, in which the runners—the auto companies—haven’t improved for 22 years.

Continue reading »